ShellforceA CCA programmeSign up

The Reef System

SHIELD

Shellfish Habitats for Integrated EcoLogical Defence.

An engineered shellfish reef built for a tropical coast, designed to do three jobs at once: break waves, build habitat, and make a place people actually want to be.

  • Living Lab CFRP-LL01-0004
  • 1 May 2026 – 30 Apr 2029
  • TRL 5 → TRL 7

Three jobs, one structure

Most sea walls only do one thing.

About 70% of Singapore's coastline is guarded by "hard" structures — engineered revetments and seawalls. They work. But they usually serve a single function: coastal protection. They tend to be less biodiverse than the shores they replaced, and they are poorly integrated with the way people actually use the water's edge.

SHIELD is an attempt to get all three returns from the same footprint — which matters in a city with very little spare land or sea space to give away.

Job 01

Coastal protection

A rough, porous, living structure sitting in the shallows takes energy out of incoming waves before they reach the beach. Slower water drops what it carries, so sedimentation increases behind the reef instead of sand being drawn away from it.

Job 02

Biodiversity

Shell is a surface marine life recognises. The reef gives juvenile shellfish, invertebrates and fish somewhere to settle, shelter and feed — turning a stretch of defended shoreline back into habitat rather than a blank wall.

Job 03

Public place

The geometry is designed to carry attachments — platforms, piers, gardens — so the structure reads as landscape, not infrastructure. People can walk it, paddle beside it and watch it change. Defence that is also somewhere to be.

Anatomy of a module

Four layers, stacked from the seabed up.

The reef is not one object. It is a repeated module — a steel cage packed with bagged shell, anchored to the seabed and quietly electrified. Each layer does a different job, and the biology is expected to take over from the engineering with time.

Exploded axonometric drawing of one reef module, separated into four labelled layers: coral and oyster growth on top, geotextile shell bags beneath it, the electrified steel cage with Biorock accretion, and the base supports and anchoring at the seabed.
Fig. 01 Exploded axonometric of a single SHIELD module, as drawn for the Living Lab proposal. Dimensions on this page are indicative and will be refined.

Indicative dimensions

Reef structure about 50 m long. Each module about 2 m wide and up to 1 m high. These are the numbers assumed in the proposal — indicative, and to be refined as the detailed design develops.

Layer 01

Coral + oyster growth

Marine life aggregates over time, drawing fish and other species, colonising the structure and enhancing coastal biodiversity. This is the layer nobody builds — it arrives on its own if the rest of the module is right.

Layer 02

Geotextile shell bags

Recycled oyster shells encased in biopolymer mesh, providing intricate surface complexity that filters water naturally and offers shelter for juvenile shellfish and invertebrates to settle and thrive.

The bags are biopolymer and designed to biodegrade after at least five years, and they are double-bagged — a lesson carried over from the 2024 pilot, where double-bagging reduced ripping and maintenance. Their only job is to hold loose shells together until biology cements them to each other.

Layer 03

Electrified cage & Biorock accretion

A low-voltage DC current drives mineral accretion across the steel, depositing a limestone-like calcium carbonate crust that forms a natural, self-healing substrate for reef-building organisms to grow on and dissipate wave energy for coastal protection.

Layer 04

Base supports & anchoring

Modular anchors and interlocking connectors secure each unit to the seabed and link adjacent modules, allowing the system to flex with site conditions while remaining stable under wave loading.

In practice this means screw-type helical anchors or reinforcing steel bar pins, with concrete U-shaped ballast blocks pinned at critical junctions to resist scouring.

The mineral layer

What Biorock actually is.

Close crop of shell-packed steel Biorock cages sitting at the waterline, the mesh bags of shells visible through the cage frame.
Fig. 02 Shell-packed cages at the waterline. The steel is the electrode; the shell is the surface; the mineral crust grows across both.

Run a safe, low-voltage current through submerged steel and seawater does something useful. Electrolysis pulls dissolved minerals out of the water and deposits them onto the steel as a limestone coating. The structure does not corrode away — it thickens.

It stops the rust

The mineral coating protects the steel instead of letting seawater eat it, so the structure gets stronger over time rather than weaker.

It speeds up life

Electrification accelerates the growth of marine organisms on the structure (Goreau, 2014) — the reef establishes faster than it would on bare substrate.

It lowers a known risk

It reduces the risk of cyanobacteria blooms associated with untreated steel sitting in seawater.

It runs on sunlight

Power comes from one or two solar panels mounted nearby. No grid connection, no fuel, no moving parts in the water.

Why this is new

Biorock has mostly been used for coral restoration. SHIELD is the first of its kind to integrate it with coastal protection — using the mineral accretion not only to grow reef, but to build a structure that has to stand up to waves.

Wide split view of the reef showing both above and below the waterline: shell-filled cages colonised by marine life underwater, and people standing on a floating platform above the surface.

Living in the tide

Underwater twice a day, in the air twice a day.

The reef sits in the intertidal zone. At high tide it is submerged. At low tide it partly emerges — and that rhythm is the point. Alternating immersion and exposure is what encourages shellfish growth, so the position of the structure in the tidal range is a design decision, not an accident of depth.

It also means the reef is legible. Twice a day, the thing doing the work is visible from the beach.

Two configurations under test

Config A

Biorock filled with oyster shells

A single-species fill. Oyster shell only, packed into the bagged cages, electrified as normal.

Config B

Biorock filled with mixed shells

A mixed fill — the oysters, mussels and cockles that actually come back from restaurant kitchens.

The two configurations are placed far enough apart that they do not interact, so the monitoring can tell which fill is doing what.

A kit of parts

Defence you can stand on.

Because the geometry is modular, multifunctional attachments can be added to it: floating platforms, fish pans, small piers, floating gardens. That is the landscape urbanism argument at the heart of the project — the structure earns social grounding, fosters visual engagement with the public, and makes place rather than only defence.

A seawall asks you to stay behind it. This asks you to come and look.

Render of the finished reef: a kayaker paddling alongside the breakwater while people walk a walkway across it, with sailboats out on the water beyond.
Fig. 03 The breakwater as a walkable edge — a route out over the water, with the recreational life of the coast carrying on around it.
Render of a floating timber platform moored beside the reef, with kayakers pulling up alongside it.
Fig. 04 A floating timber platform attached to the module grid — one of the kit-of-parts components, here used as a landing for kayaks.
Render of people sitting and gathering together on the floating platform above the reef.
Fig. 05 Sitting, not just passing through. The attachments are what convert a piece of coastal engineering into somewhere to spend an afternoon.
Render of people standing on the exposed reef at low tide during a guided observation walk, looking at the shell surface.
Fig. 06 Low tide, reef exposed, guided observation. The same hours that grow the shellfish are the hours the public can read the structure closely.
Render of stacked semi-circular Biorock modules forming a curved reef body, with a walkway across the top and a small white human figure included for scale.
Fig. 07 Stacked semi-circular modules with a walkway over the top. The white figure gives the scale of a single unit.

Where

NSRCC beach, East Coast — assumed, not fixed.

The shoreline assumed in the proposal is NSRCC beach (National Service Resort & Country Club), East Coast, mainland Singapore. The final site is to be confirmed by PUB. Everything on this page that depends on location — orientation, wave exposure, module count — follows from that decision, and that decision has not been made yet.

What makes a site suitable

Four criteria narrow the search. They are as much about being able to learn something as about protecting a shoreline.

Criterion 01

Sandy beach or mudflat

A soft, shallow foreshore the modules can be anchored into.

Criterion 02

Real wave action

Significant wave action, with a history of erosion — otherwise there is nothing to attenuate and nothing to measure.

Criterion 03

Shellfish nearby

Natural shellfish populations close enough to supply recruitment onto the new structure.

Criterion 04

Moderate public access

People can reach it and see it, without the site being so busy that the experiment is compromised.

Site notes

The site carries coastal fauna and flora of conservation significance, including limited seagrass and coral, and it sits near a water sports recreation centre. Both facts shape the baseline surveys and the environmental impact assessment that come before anything is built.

How the work is divided

Three work packages.

Design, build, and find out. Each package has a named lead and a different discipline behind it.

WP 1

Landscape integration and conceptual reef system design

Lead · Eva Castro, SUTD

A Research by Design methodology: an iterative design loop where the reef geometry, the landscape proposition and the numbers are developed against each other rather than in sequence. Carbon calculations run alongside the design.

Wave attenuation is validated in an XBeach nearshore hydrodynamic model built by Witteveen+Bos, with a sensitivity analysis on reef orientation and location — so the design can be tested against a range of placements before anything is committed.

WP 2

Detailed reef structure and construction development

Lead · Eric Leong, Mlion Corporation

Steel cage engineering, shell cleaning and packing, fabrication and quality control, installation, and electrification. This is the package that turns a drawing into something that can be lifted onto a workboat.

Mlion aims to use recycled steel to reduce the embodied carbon of the structure.

WP 3

Monitoring and research synthesis

Lead · Jaïr Smits, SUTD

Baseline surveys and an environmental impact assessment before deployment, then monitoring for at least a year afterwards. Without this package the reef is a sculpture; with it, it is evidence.

Measurement

How we will know if it worked.

Four indicators, monitored for at least a year. Some of them are instruments in the water. One of them is asking people what they think.

Indicator 01

Hydrodynamic impact

Two wave gauges — pressure sensors — one in front of the reef and one behind it, so the difference between them is the reef's effect. An air pressure sensor supports the post-processing. Sediment dynamics are tracked with sediment traps and survey, to see whether sand is accumulating where the model says it should.

Indicator 02

Ecological function

Intertidal biodiversity surveys before deployment to set a baseline, then repeated at regular intervals afterwards. Recruitment of live shellfish onto the structure is tracked directly. Water quality is logged across six measures: pH, temperature, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, salinity and turbidity.

Indicator 03

Structural durability

Regular visual inspection for rust, breakage and failure. The Biorock coating is expected to strengthen the steel over time, but "expected" is not "observed" — so the structure gets looked at, repeatedly, by people.

Indicator 04

Public responsiveness

Qualitative interviews on how the public perceives and relates to the reef. If the landscape argument is real, it has to show up in what people say about the thing — not only in what the sensors record.

Aspirational targets

Four numbers that steer the project — and are not promises.

The proposal is explicit about this: these are aspirational targets intended to guide the project and inform decision-making, not binding commitments. They exist to give the design something to aim at and to make trade-offs discussable. Read them as direction, not as a guarantee of outcome.

10%Reduction in local wave energy and/or crest levels, against baseline.
20%Increase in native intertidal species, against baseline.
25%Lower production costs than representative coastal protection measures.
50%Reduction in carbon emissions against representative coastal protection measures.

The consortium

Who is building it.

Host

SUTD

Singapore University of Technology and Design hosts the project, through the Centre for Climate Adaptation — which operates as a multi-centre with Pratt Institute, Pace University and Aalto University.

Partner

Mlion Corporation

Partner institution. Mlion carries the engineering, fabrication and installation of the reef structure under Work Package 2.

Specialist

Witteveen+Bos SEA

Witteveen+Bos South-East Asia provides specialist services: ecological validation and hydrodynamic modelling, including the XBeach model behind the wave attenuation estimates.

Support

HSL Constructor

Construction support, and a temporary staging site for assembly and preparatory activities.

The people

Lead Principal Investigator

Prof. Eva Castro, SUTD — Professor of Practice in Landscape Urbanism and director of the Centre for Climate Adaptation at SUTD. Leads Work Package 1.

Co-Investigator

Eric Leong, founder and CEO of Mlion Corporation. Leads Work Package 2.

Co-Investigator

Jaïr Smits, SUTD. Leads Work Package 3 — baseline surveys, environmental impact assessment and monitoring.

Collaborators

Peter Frederick Ortner, SUTD (Net Zero Futures) — carbon accounting and cost-benefit. Pia Fricker, Aalto University, Academic Lead of the Centre for Climate Adaptation at Aalto — computational landscape design.

Funding

SHIELD is funded by PUB on behalf of the National Research Foundation under the Coastal Protection and Flood Management Research Programme (Living Lab), reference CFRP-LL01-0004. Grant not exceeding S$1,870,470, over the period 1 May 2026 – 30 April 2029. The project starts at Technology Readiness Level 5 and targets TRL 7.

Onward

The reef only exists if the shells do.

Every cage on this page is waiting on bags of cleaned, sun-dried shell from Singapore restaurant kitchens. That part is not engineering. That part is people.

Next

Which shells

Oysters, mussels, cockles — what we can use, what we cannot, and why the sorting matters.

Shells

Next

Shell to breakwater

The full workflow: collection, freshwater cleaning, weeks of sun-drying, bagging, and installation offshore.

Process

Next

Get involved

Shell collection, preparation shifts, and citizen-science biodiversity monitoring once the reef is in the water.

Join a shift

Questions about the reef system

If you want detail this page does not cover — a restaurant partnership, a research question, a request to visit the work — write to shellforce@cca-sg.com or sarah_tuke@sutd.edu.sg. More on the research centre behind SHIELD at cca-sg.com.

Next: Shells →